‘Tis no great mischief if they fall’ General Wolfe famously remarked as he sent the Black Watch off to scale the Heights of Abraham during the Siege of Quebec in 1759 . These dismissive sentiments persist into our era as we follow the desperately sad story of the Chagos Islanders. ‘ Stealing A Nation’ (2004)’ is an extraordinary film about the plight of the Chagos Islands, whose indigenous population was secretly and brutally expelled by British Governments in the late 1960s and early 1970s to make way for an American military base. The tragedy, which falls within the remit of the International Criminal Court as “a crime against humanity”, is told by Islanders who were dumped in the slums of Mauritius and by British officials who left behind a damning trail of Foreign Office documents. The tragic story of the Chagos Islanders is part of a pattern of disregard for the life and welfare of its citizens which representatives of the British State have frequently displayed in territories for which they are responsible from the Indian Ocean to the North Atlantic. How does this sad story of the Chagos islanders have a bearing on the nuclear base at Faslane? Well, bear with me and read on…..
Before the Americans came, more than 2,000 people lived on the islands in the Indian Ocean, many with roots back to the late 18th century. There were thriving villages, a school, a hospital, a church, a railway and an undisturbed way of life. The islands were, and still are, a British crown colony. In the 1960s, the government of Harold Wilson struck a secret deal with the United States to hand over the main island of Diego Garcia. The Americans demanded that the surrounding islands be “swept” and “sanitized”. Unknown to Parliament and to the US Congress and in breach of the United Nations Charter, the British Government plotted with Washington to expel the entire population.
After demonstrating on the streets of Mauritius in 1982, the exiled islanders were given the derisory compensation of less than £3,000 per person by the British government. In the film, former inhabitants Rita Bancoult and Charlesia Alexis tell of how, in accepting the money, they were tricked into signing away their right to return home: “It was entirely improper, unethical and dictatorial to have the Chagossian put his thumbprint on an English legal, drafted document, where the Chagossian, who doesn’t read, know or speak any English, let alone any legal English, is made to renounce basically all his rights as a human being.”
Today, the main island of Diego Garcia is America’s largest military base in the world, outside the US. There are more than 4,000 troops, two bomber runways, thirty warships and a satellite spy station. The Pentagon calls it an “indispensable platform” for policing the world. It was used as a launch pad for the invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq.
The truth about the removal of the Chagossians and the Whitehall conspiracy to deny there was an indigenous population did not emerge for another twenty years, when files were unearthed at the Public Record Office, in Kew, by the historian Mark Curtis, John Pilger and lawyers for the former inhabitants of the coral archipelago, who were campaigning for a return to their homeland.
John Pilger, the eminent campaigning journalist and documentary film-maker, first become aware of the plight of the Chagossians in 1982, during the Falklands War: “It was pointed out to me that Britain had sent a fleet to go and save two thousand Falkland Islanders at the other end of the world while two thousand British citizens in islands in the middle of the Indian Ocean had been expelled by British governments and the only difference was that one lot were white and the others were black. The other difference was that the United States wanted the Chagos Islands – and especially Diego Garcia – as a major base. So nothing was said, which tells us something about the ruthlessness of governments, especially imperial governments.”
In June 2004, shortly before Stealing a Nation’s television screening, the British Government had issued an order-in-council, a royal decree using archaic powers invested in the Queen, bypassing Parliament and the High Court, to ban the Islanders from ever returning home. “The Queen rubber-stamps what in many cases politicians know they can’t get away with democratically,” said Pilger. “Dictators do this, but without the quaint ritual.”
In May 2006, the English High Court finally ruled that the Chagossians were entitled to return to their homeland. However, in the summer of 2008, David Miliband and the Foreign Office began another appeal, to the Law Lords, against the High Court’s judgements. They found in favour of the Government.
In April 2010, the British Government established a marine nature reserve around the Chagos Islands. Several months later, WikiLeaks published a US Embassy diplomatic cable from 2009 which read as follows: “Establishing a marine reserve might indeed, as the FCO’s [Colin] Roberts stated, be the most effective long-term way to prevent any of the Chagos Islands’ former inhabitants or descendants from resettling in the [British Indian Ocean Territory].”
In the film, John Pilger concludes: “Why do we continue to allow our governments to treat people in small countries as either useful or expendable? Why do we accept specious reasons for the unacceptable? The High Court issued one of the most damning indictments of a British government. It said the secret expulsion of the Chagos Islanders was wrong. That judgement must be upheld and the people of a group of beautiful, once peaceful islands must be helped to go home and compensated fully and without delay for their suffering. Anything less diminishes the rest of us.”
We must be grateful to Pilger also for digging out the following pearl of information: as part of the deal which dispossessed the Chagos islanders of their ancestral home . This was a condition whereby, if the British Government kicked the Chagos Islanders out of Diego Garcia, in return the British Government would receive from the Americans a £14 million discount on the cost of Polaris missiles so that it could continue to pursue its delusion of imperial grandeur and be seen as a major nuclear power.
Where could that new and deadly toy be stored but at the naval base at Faslane – at that time a conventional naval base? Quoting John Pilger above :
‘Why do we continue to treat people in small countries as either useful or expendable?’ The danger of siting nuclear weaponry at naval bases at Devonport or even in the Thames was clearly as politically unacceptable in 1968 as siting the UK’s first experimental fast breeder reactor ten years earlier in 1958 anywhere other than at Dounreay on the Pentland Firth at the opposite end of the British Isles from London and the self-appointed home of the rule of law which tragically failed the Chagos Islanders. We, however, on 18th September unlike them have the opportunity to undo these dangerous and immoral impositions on us by voting YES and removing nuclear weapons from the Clyde and completing the decommissioning of Dounreay which is still the home of the Vulcan Naval Reactor Test Establishment which experiments with nuclear power.
See John Pilger’s film ‘ Stealing a Nation’ here –if you can bear the appalling tale he has to tell and the callous attitude of British and US civil servants and politicians who to this day make little or no apology for the atrocity they presided over. In it you will catch the complicated but significant connection between the plight of the Chagos islanders and the Faslane Nuclear base.